So, to use your example, you would need a windtunnel with enough airflow to balance the amount of thrust from the engines to get the plane airborne yet remain stationary. In this case, you are only moving the ground, so no force is cancelled out and the plane takes off as normal.
....it's a matter of airflow at the wings.
A treadmill only matters for things that depend on transfering energy to the ground for forward motion. A plane's engines do not do this.
The engines do not produce enough airflow when the plane is standing still (via the treadmill cancelling out the forward motion) to create lift under the wings. They are not meant to.I know what some people are thinking....what about when the plane is in the air? Well, once a body is in motion, it tends to stay in motion. The engines only need to produce enough thrust to counter gravity and drag and keep the correct amount of negative pressure under the wings to keep the plane in the air (i.e. minimum windspeed).
That's not how planes fly, though. The design of the wing of an airplane is such that when air moves over it, higher pressure is produced below the wing and lower pressure is produced above the wing. This is called lift. A plane MUST have lift to fly. A plane can take off when the lift produced by the wings is greater than the weight of the plane. The minimum air speed to keep a plane in the air is it's stall speed. Notice ground speed is irrelevant.If you could point a giant fan at an airplane and generate enough air speed to just exceed the stall speed of a given airplane, it could lift off and fly without moving forward. Now, the air would also push the plane backwards, since it generates friction as it moves over the airframe. Some thrust is required to overcome the friction, or eventually the backward motion of the airplane would begin to match the speed of the air.Ground speed doesn't figure into an airplane's ability to fly., therefore, the treadmill doesn't matter.
i'm sure you've seen tugs tow planes in reverse when they back out of terminal gates. that's because the wheels have no drive mechanism...and because the engines don't produce enough fwd thrust to move in reverse (except for the C17 cargo plane and some other specialized aircraft).
c'mon over to SoCal for lunch so we could have a beer! :wink:
Quote from: "miguel"i'm sure you've seen tugs tow planes in reverse when they back out of terminal gates. that's because the wheels have no drive mechanism...and because the engines don't produce enough fwd thrust to move in reverse (except for the C17 cargo plane and some other specialized aircraft).actually most planes have thrust reversers. a reverse gear if you will. i don't know if they use them to scoot around the runways though. i imagine they could but it's probably a lot cheaper to operate those little tug cars than to spool up the engines. i think they're mainly used during emergency landings with brake failure.
When I get there, it won't be lunchtime anymore!